Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Begich III (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to 2024 United States House of Representatives election in Alaska. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Begich III (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable congressional candidate. All coverage is election-related or passing mentions. Doesn't meet NPOL and I don't see how he meets GNG either. This page was previously created and deleted back in 2023. I'd support a redirect to to 2024 United States House of Representatives election in Alaska. The result of the previous discussion was a redirect to the page for the 2022 election; at this point, it makes more sense to redirect to the 2024 page since Begich is now in a one-on-one race with the incumbent, unlike in 2022 when there was another Republican in the race. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 16:15, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yedaman54: do you think the article should be deleted or made into a redirect? BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 15:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The last decision was made in part on the basis of COI edits, which have now been removed. Begich meets Wikipedia:GNG on several grounds:
  1. Substantial media coverage of his 2022 campaign, similar to that of Jon Ossoff's campaign, which a 2017 deletion review and discussion found was notable despite his losing the race.
  2. As the majority-preferred candidate of the 2022 Alaska special, which also makes this an article of interest for WikiProject Social choice, because it makes him useful as a prototypical example of the kind of majority-preferred candidate who loses such an election (see center squeeze).
  3. Past work in Alaska politics (as a high-profile Republican from the Begich family).
  4. Past career as a software entrepeneur.
– Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 03:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That second reason doesn't make sense. You're arguing that the election is notable, not that Begich *himself* is notable. See WP:1E. Bkissin already pointed out the issue with the third reason, and the fourth...you're going to have to expand on that, because I don't see how being a "software entrepreneur" proves notability. As for the first reason, yes it's true that some unelected candidates get a WP page, but that doesn't mean *all* unelected candidates get a page. If Begich loses the 2024 race, will people still be searching his name in 10 years? BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 21:46, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I honestly don't feel right voting on it one way or the other, given that the reason I looked into him at all was the "expand this section" flag that was on the article. That said, the article was just undeleted (diff) on the 25th of September. Just... strikes me as odd to undelete it only to renom for deletion. I apologize if I missed this one needing to stay in drafts - I likely still would have looked up the info seeing the flag and all, but I would have also notified someone and asked about moving it back to drafts if that's where it should be.
OIM20 (talk) 03:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.