Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/152 (film) (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nothing presented here convinces me this subject passes WP:GNG. Fails GNG.

Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 17:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

152 (film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Last AfD was no consensus, with No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. Still believe it fails WP:NFILM. LibStar (talk) 23:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:20, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:20, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I can't find any reliable source through google search. Mommmyy (talk) 19:53, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm neutral on this, but I will note that if the article is deleted now because the minor notices in local news articles, etc. that were presumably enough for it to be snow-kept in 2008 have since disappeared from the web, that could, that could have serious implications for WP:NTEMP. Yeah, it wouldn't be implicated if the 2008 !votes were problematically ignoring the lack of any in-depth coverage that would be of long-term relevance, but if that can happen in a case like this, we really should think about the value of "it's notable -- I found a bunch of sources on Google"-type arguments in general going forward. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 06:42, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Borderline, seems to have been at two festivals, one of them international. Deathlibrarian (talk) 22:05, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Kansai International Film Festival article was recently deleted. LibStar (talk) 22:29, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In Japan, "international" film festivals organized by western ex-pats seem to be mostly vanity projects showcasing films made by "international" people who all happen to live in Japan and who aren't exactly big names in the international film community. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 00:42, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Kansai International Film Festival was exactly that, and run by the creator of this film. So the film and festival were run by the same person. LibStar (talk) 01:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with Libstar that inclusion in a film festival run by the same person who created this film does not indicate notability. The other cited source is apparently dead and has been for a while; not sure it was a reliable source to begin with. 2 reviews at two fansites are not indicators of notability. No current other mentions in reliable sources found. Fred Zepelin (talk) 17:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/152 (film) (3rd nomination)

152 (film)

zproxy.org