Jump to content

User talk:Okiknowyouknow

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prakriti Lamsal Case 2025 (February 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
qcne (talk) 14:45, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Okiknowyouknow! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 14:45, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:32, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for assisting in the same, can you please let me know, for what exactly you are concerned, currently I have raised 2 articles for review, leme know for which one you are talking about. @AlphaBetaGamma Okiknowyouknow (talk) 05:36, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, you incorrectly declined two articles, which I reverted one of them and rejected the another. Please don't try to review drafts, and wait until you have enough experience here. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:37, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh Understood, thanks for you guidance, I will work on the same, also can you review my draft, Draft:Prakriti Lamsal Case 2025 and Draft:Takshashila Vidyapith as you are experienced you can do a favour by checking these 2, if they qualify the eligiblity or not. @AlphaBetaGamma Okiknowyouknow (talk) 05:40, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Responded at the appropriate venue. Do note that most reviewers will not prioritize your drafts just because you asked them to. I've reviewed one of them, but I'm intentionally leaving the other alone, because I'm not sure if the event has lasting notability. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:49, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Takshashila Vidyapith (February 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AlphaBetaGamma were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Roughly half of the entire draft is unsourced. 3 of the 5 sources given are not independent of the subject, and the other 2 does mention the events held in the school, but fails to provide significant coverage for the school itself.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:46, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prakriti Lamsal Case 2025 (February 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rahmatula786 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
already there is an article on this topic
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Rahmatula786 (talk) 09:00, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Takshashila Vidyapith (February 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Gheus (talk) 17:21, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abhinav Ankit (February 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The sources don't show this meets the requirements at WP:GNG

Reference 1 is an iMDB listing. Not independent and not reliable as IMDB hosts user-generated content

Reference 2 is a profile on the subjects own website. Not independent, can be used for verifying basic facts but does not show notability

Reference 3 is another "author" profile of Ankit. Not independent

Reference 4 is the closest thing to proper coverage, but the article doesn't really go into detail on Ankit besides mentioning him as the author of the research

Reference 5 is an article posted on the subjects own website. Not independent

You need multiple sources (ideally 3 or more) that are:

  • completely unaffiliated with the subject
  • provide significant coverage (i.e. talk in detail, at least two paragraphs) about t he subject
  • are considered to be reliable, especially when reporting on living persons. If you are unsure of the quality of a source, see the list at WP:RSP or ask at the reliable sources noticeboard.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
SK2242 (talk) 06:02, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop reviewing AfC drafts

[edit]

Hi. Please stop reviewing drafts at AfC. ABG already told you not to 4 days ago. I have just had to revert all of your declines. You need to meet the requirements listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants and then apply. SK2242 (talk) 06:54, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for letting me know about the requirements list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants . I was unknown to that, I will keep this in mind thanks for helping, Okiknowyouknow (talk) 10:09, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hema Sharma (February 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cinder painter was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cinder painter (talk) 15:18, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hema Sharma for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hema Sharma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hema Sharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

bonadea contributions talk 08:17, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Okiknowyouknow&oldid=1278066329"