Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Fistful of Turkeys
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Metagaming Concepts. Liz Read! Talk! 02:43, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- A Fistful of Turkeys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability, there’s one ref provided, but it’s a capsule one and not significant coverage. There isn't a notability guide for board games, but the one for movies consider capsule reviews to be not significant: Examples of coverage insufficient to fully establish notability include newspaper listings of screening times and venues, "capsule reviews"
. I could find another ref (https://books.google.com.au/books?id=b58pAQAAIAAJ&q=A+Fistful+of+Turkeys+game&dq=A+Fistful+of+Turkeys+game&hl=zh-CN&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjFmf3Uvdv4AhU0RWwGHT5OB_YQ6AF6BAgEEAI), a passing mention, bit this doesn’t have multiple reliable refs. Please ping me if you find anymore refs, thanks! VickKiang (talk) 00:43, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:46, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, no sources found beyond the one cited. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:59, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Possibly merge into Metagaming Concepts unless more sources can be found. BOZ (talk) 01:41, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Appears to meet the letter of WP:N at this point, but probably best editorially to merge per BOZ unless there are some more sources. Hobit (talk) 10:41, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Merge. If User:BOZ, the creator, says merge, then merge. Although yes, technically we have two sources, so GNG is met, but given the name (capsule reviews) I fear they are just a paragraph long or so, so WP:SIGCOV may not be met (User:BOZ may comment more on my speculation...). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:41, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.