Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Brooks (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:04, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Roger Brooks

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Roger Brooks
• Articles for deletion/Roger Brooks (2nd nomination)

Roger Brooks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is advertising. I tried to reduce it to a reasonable article, but found that there was too little of substance,. DGG ( talk ) 23:03, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 23:05, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

• Delete as there's still nothing actually suggesting any solid independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 23:19, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:NBIO - not a subject of any significant publication or study. Merely being quoted in the press does not establish notability per WP:BIO. — kashmiri ^TALK 17:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
• Keep I still see him in the papers all the time, but I haven't looked at this page in years so have no strong opinion about it. Most of the articles are about his work in small towns, not just being quoted, but again no strong opinion. Jeremy112233 ^{(Lettuce-jibber-jabber?)} 16:43, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
• Delete The vast majority of the coverage is passing mentions. Some of the references which have a bit more substance are either local sources or non-reliable sources. I still cannot see any particular reason or exceptional work this tourism expert is notable for. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 12:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.