Talk:2012 Fatah–Hamas Cairo Agreement

Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request

This page is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a restricted topic. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)

Administrators may disregard the above message.
You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If administrator}}. You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning { display: none; }

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Egypt Mid‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Anguye48, G erika, Lrichar, Jmcdona23. Peer reviewers: Bholmes 2.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why 2012

The reason to put 2012 is because there was another Palestinian agreement in Cairo in 2011.GreyShark (dibra) 22:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good Start, Needs Expansion

You all have a good start to the article, it just needs to be expanded upon. In the Leader, maybe place the "signed in May 2012 in Cairo Egypt" into a separate sentence. I feel that will bring clarity to the very first sentence. Either in the Background section on a separate section, add more details about how/why the accord failed. Overall, this article piques my interest and possesses no bias. The facts ae presented in the same style as an encyclopedia. An image of a map showing where the Gaza Strip and the Palestinian National Authority are located will spruce the article up. Keep up the good work! Rcelenta (talk) 19:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More Background Information

I am still a bit confused about the content of the article. I think you can expand more on the information and break down the concepts into smaller parts. The article states information that the reader might not have previous knowledge on. Try breaking down this information in order to express the data more clearly. You can also expand on the background to further introduce the agreement and back up the information from credible sources. The organization of the article works well and helps separate the elements of the agreement. Nolachic101 (talk) 21:03, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a little vague. What you have here is good but unsatisfying. What exactly is this agreement? What does it mean for the people? Who is responsible for making sure that the agreement was held up? Maybe try doing a little more research on the topic. Getting a better understanding of what is going on with it. Bholmes 2 (talk) 00:31, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

the article had a strong start but the more one read into it, it became repetitive and more over it didn't give much insight about the people the agreement would effect. more research needs to be conducted in order for this article to be made better. when doing research think of it as you looking for evidence or sources the would help you write your own paper. Zholly (talk) 01:48, 13 March 2017 (UTC) zholly[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

Why 2012

Good Start, Needs Expansion

More Background Information

zproxy.org